Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello,

the Dresden-Görlitz line is already in the works. I'm already incredibly excited about it - and of course about other German routes. The quality that I already know from SimRail (and then expect) makes enormous anticipation in me awake.
SHP and Co are very simple train control systems. But will PZB (and for the future LZB, as well as ETCS with German rules) also be reproduced correctly and in detail?

Honestly, I'm already looking forward to the release of the German line with PZB, when many first regularly behind signals (or before) involuntarily come to a halt xD

 

Larynx

 

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So even "Geschwindigkeitsprüfabschnitte" are present in the game and correctly implemented? (like the variation of 1000Hz and 2000Hz Magnets, with the possibility to accept them (wachsam) when its a 1000Hz one?!)

Edited by Larynx
  • I disagree 2
  • I agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SugaCane said:

Thx for the random downvote xD.
The Track is build by third party.
And SimRail don't give you such informations. You will see it when its out...
 

What? They hired them... they're the only ones they answer to. It's like a company hiring a businessman to do a job. The entrepreneur documents the results of the work to the company that hired him. SimRail is just the quality control officer. There are several outside firms working on Star Citizen, too, and you can't tell.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

vor einer Stunde schrieb Larynx:

So even "Gleisprüfabschnitte" are present in the game and correctly implemented? (like the variation of 1000Hz and 2000Hz Magnets, with the possibility to accept them (wachsam) when its a 1000Hz one?!)

First: When you want to be so correct, you should say it correct: Geschwindigkeitsprüfabschnitt

I think, when the route will come the PZB will have full functionality.

To be honest I don't understand your question exactly. You can also ask "Are the signal boxes implemented correctly as they are in reallife?" so its a bit wasted...

Edited by Moooritz
  • Like 1
  • I agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Moooritz said:

First: When you want to be so correct, you should say it correct: Geschwindigkeitsprüfabschnitt

I think, when the route will come the PZB will have full functionality.

To be honest I don't understand your question exactly. You can also ask "Are the signal boxes implemented correctly as they are in reallife?" so its a bit wasted...

Sorry for the offtopic, but this insanely long and convoluted word 😄 Geschwindigkeitsprüfabschnitt

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

vor 1 Minute schrieb lDestinyl:

Sorry for the offtopic, but this insanely long and convoluted word 😄 Geschwindigkeitsprüfabschnitt

German 😄 you can also call this Geschwindigkeitsprüfeinrichtung (GPE) or Geschwindigkeitsüberwachungseinrichtung (GÜ) instead of GPA 😛

There are many words in Train-German which are very long and very confusing 😄

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use Privacy Policy