Kaito Kid

Ah, just saw this message, this is somewhat what I was talking about.

Hello! It looks that what I'm the best at is asking questions. 🤣 Would it be possible to have the stations in the vertical axis and the hours in the horizontal one? Something similar to this: https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjKZZM8YEL3Oyv1zzumWAQtKVkbL3VU7lm1OxV_na0xmzTP1EgU0b9ibmQ060TeE0oCIOsejS2IybXlxEqOpuG0jl1xYRQNlyY9oh9Am7IHY1fgBeiMsRQGUhnNUxN1Q8rwupc9UMfniDmB/s1600/MALLA.jpg From here: https://blog.comofuncionanlostrenes.es/2012/12/puesto-de-mando-y-ctc.html

👍 Imma try to simplify it, the excess of information that gives the STRO even when zoomed, wouldn't happen if I only had the stations that I wanted in the STRO, even with the extended view this happens. Let's say I would like to have only represented Katowice Zadodzie <-> Sosnowiec Glowny/Poludniowy <-> Bedzin, everything but that, would remain hidden, so the STRO would have a dropdown list that looked somewhat like: From [Station] <-> To [Station], in the case shown would be, From [Katowice] <-> To [Bedzin Miasto], looking somewhat like this: (Edited: Forgot to set opacity to "100" in Katowice Zawodzie. 😅) Or something similar to this: But I guess repositioning stations like this, would be waaaaay to complicated, or at least it what it looks like to me. 😂 This, together with the veil, would be a good option too and would look like something somewhat to the 1st picture that I posted. I tried opening a second browser tab but it didn't load any trains or stations... How does that work?

That's why I threw the "velo" option, little that I know about coding, in my mind sounds more simple to make a "veil" that hides things rather than "spacing" the rows. About the stations, maybe instead of a list, have the possibility to draw then from A <-> C for example? Theoretically this should be more simple, as it would "draw" less stations that what it actually brings to the screen? Or would this be also heavy editing? Sorry if I sound like a pain in the arse. 😂

Thanks for your reply, I know nothing about coding and the little things I do, I do them with AI. 😅 But in relation to the 2nd point, I "more or less" knew that it was going to be a tad difficult, as it's not a thing that really depends on you. In relation to the 1st point, could you then perhaps make more "space" between the drawn lines? Leaving more black space I mean, so when you "zoom in", you won't be able to see the stations under or on top, or maybe add something like a "veil" you could pull from top and from under to cover what you don't wanna see? Again, thanks for your reply and work!

Hello! Would it be possible to add a select station list? So you could decide from which station to which station represent in the SRTO? For example, instead of having the whole network... Let's say I'm at Zawiercie stn, perhaps I would like to only have represented Lazy La <-> Zawiercie <-> Gora Wlodowska, would it be possible to implement this feature? This second suggestion perhaps is extremely difficult to implement, but would it be possible to have the train "draw" the path it's going to take in the SRTO?

Thanks for the reply, even though I very much welcome the main wiki and the information about actual posts, for me it's insufficient as it doesn't really explain you what you can/can't do in there, what routes are compatible/incompatible, etc. You still have to go through "trial & error" until you get accustomed to it by that procedure 😅. For example, since the very beginning I'm using Semaforek site to the the "main situation" of the post, there I can find signals, cargo dock (if it still exists), information about tracks, etc. Despite the excellent info that the diagrams gives you there, no technical information about the post can be found at Semaforek, so yeah.

Possibility to "inject" trains from terminal stations and into the line, this would have the possibility to add: - Creation time and in which track - Type of consist - Time of departure and from what platform Depending on the type of train, it will assume the passing time in minutes from one station to the other according to existing trains in Simrail. For example, if it's an EN57 stopping at all stations, it will apply the same travel time between stations as it already does with a programmed service, same thing for freight trains, express trains, intercity trains, empty trains, etc. When these player created trains arrives to the final stop, if that station is player controlled, the dispatcher would be able to give "orders" to that train such as: decouple, push, pull, make it return prior reversing the engine or change cabs and or send it into a siding. If "Send it to a siding" is emitted, train will roll into a siding, if the train is: - EMU/DMU: Train will disappear upon stopping, lowering pantograph and disconnecting battery. - Locomotive: It will disappear upon the same procedure as above, if it was hauling something, this will disappear at the same time the engine does. If it's not player controlled or if the player just joined after the train has already stopped, the train will disappear seconds after arriving and stopping, as there was no player to "receive" that train, it can stop in the main tracks for a couple of seconds prior to its deletion.

Thanks for your reply, anyways, it should be part of the signal post menu. Btw, is this the wiki you're refering to? https://simrail.fandom.com/wiki/Katowice

Pardon the ping @Crypter Emerald, I know you guys said that the graph part needs to be reworked, but if I remember correctly it was still available in older versions, I remember asking for this but I can't seem to find the link that someone gave me... Could you provide the link to the experimental version that has the graph? Also, dark mode seems to work in Google Chrome, but when using Brave, it only allows you to have the light mode only (I'm aware of this issue), just wanted to let you know about this.

It would be great to have some documentation about each signal box with its diagram, something similar to what we have in Spain, and I'm sure Poland also has: https://forotrenes.com/foro/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=53387&start=20

Pardon the ping after 5 months already, early ¿videos? and images showed already mechanichal signal boxes, dunno what went wrong from there to now. All that I know is that, when asking for mechanichal signal boxes you will just get a "we're working on it" and that's it, so yeah... Which is somewhat an insufficient answer to a lot of people.

It would be great to have all servers. BTW, could we get that when resizing a window of a selected train, when closing that and opening a new window of a different train, this maintains the last configuration?

Nada como acudir a la RAE: https://dle.rae.es/reemplazar?m=form "La Real Academia Española (RAE) considera que "reemplazar" es la forma más recomendable, especialmente cuando se refiere a la acción de volver a emplazar o situar algo en un lugar. "

Who says no one noticed?🤣You? Thing is that I at least don't have much time to enter here as much as I would like, but trust me that I did notice some days ago and I was expecting some kind of announcement/correction or even a note on behalf of you guys saying something about deleting it, but it seems that I expect too much from people that more than trying to calm things down they simply like adding more coal to this fire.😂Anyways, I was about to post something regarding this topic but as I said, I'm not here 24/7 to say this and that, so I would like you to don't take me or us for fools please and once again, you people (or in this case you) instead of giving a straightforward answer are blaming us for no noticing? If you think giving a straightforward answer is worse that running around in circles like you're doing and blaming us like in this matter, you're wrong. 😅 This ain't serious man. Also I see that you have time to reply one of my messages @uetam, could you please reply also to my 1st one (and many others asking the same thing) about if Simrail is going to allow 3rd party content (be it freeware or payware) on multiplayer? Or if 3rd party content is on the table at all.... Also it would be good to put on the table the debate for private servers so things like these won't happen again, but instead of creating a constructive debate with constructive criticism and trying to calm things down, no, moar coal... Doesn't help the mocking that I saw somewhere in an official discord too (at least that's my impression using a translator)... Letting the topic of deletion of servers apart and the unanswered questions aside... A lot of us care about the game, I have been playing since the playtests and I've recommended this simulator to a lot of people and we do participate when our time allows us, would I like it to be it more often? Hell yeah. Anyways, do what you want but if you accept suggestions, your "blame" towards us/me looks more like a mock to me, cause you tell me that no one noticed. but reading all this concerning to the deletion of the ES server and seeing that no one cares about answering questions let me ask you something... Would it have change something at all if I was 24/7 here and opened a post asking about it? Let me guess... No, it wouldn't have changed anything at all, so again, don't take us for fools.