jokka83 Posted April 8 Author Posted April 8 I've done some dispatching on INT5 and the new timetable. I know this is not the final product, but I like to come with some thoughts. I think this is a good change for drivers. It will not be constantly stupid delays as I think have been the norm for a long time. Now the traffic is going more as you expect. However, I have seen some delays that I don't like. some 35xxx have I seen crossing Psary late. Also 344xxx have been delaying 31xx/35xx several times. I suggest forcing Kozlow holding 344xxx
jokka83 Posted April 10 Author Posted April 10 What happened to the cool night services? 12 car EP08 140km/h 600 ton.
jokka83 Posted April 11 Author Posted April 11 I think it makes more sense if 53xxx does let 53xx/13xx pass at WP than at Psary.
jokka83 Posted April 30 Author Posted April 30 (edited) Further on the previous point, I think this timetable from WP shows an issue here. I think it is a good idea to have 53xxx wait for 13xx/53xx at WP, but then the EIP has to cross at time. If he is early, 53xxx is just gonna stand and do nothing. As a dispatcher at WP, I want 53xxx to follow right after so he can be more or less "trailing" the pendo for the Sprowa signal. Edited April 30 by jokka83
jokka83 Posted 6 hours ago Author Posted 6 hours ago Hi again. 🙂 Not sure if it is intentional or not, but I feel such a long PT is wrong(INT5).
jokka83 Posted 23 minutes ago Author Posted 23 minutes ago Further, look at how the times changes form hour to hour between same train number. 1320xx. Psary I like that. However, some of these PTs are just too long for any player want to hold or drive them. 132077: 132081: This is not really a complain. I like the new timetable. But I'm not sure if it will be that popular with these many and/or long PTs
Recommended Posts