jokka83 Posted April 8 Author Posted April 8 I've done some dispatching on INT5 and the new timetable. I know this is not the final product, but I like to come with some thoughts. I think this is a good change for drivers. It will not be constantly stupid delays as I think have been the norm for a long time. Now the traffic is going more as you expect. However, I have seen some delays that I don't like. some 35xxx have I seen crossing Psary late. Also 344xxx have been delaying 31xx/35xx several times. I suggest forcing Kozlow holding 344xxx
jokka83 Posted April 10 Author Posted April 10 What happened to the cool night services? 12 car EP08 140km/h 600 ton.
jokka83 Posted April 11 Author Posted April 11 I think it makes more sense if 53xxx does let 53xx/13xx pass at WP than at Psary.
jokka83 Posted April 30 Author Posted April 30 (edited) Further on the previous point, I think this timetable from WP shows an issue here. I think it is a good idea to have 53xxx wait for 13xx/53xx at WP, but then the EIP has to cross at time. If he is early, 53xxx is just gonna stand and do nothing. As a dispatcher at WP, I want 53xxx to follow right after so he can be more or less "trailing" the pendo for the Sprowa signal. Edited April 30 by jokka83
jokka83 Posted 6 hours ago Author Posted 6 hours ago Hi again. 🙂 Not sure if it is intentional or not, but I feel such a long PT is wrong(INT5).
Recommended Posts